Australian servers performed marginally better, averaging around 50Mbps. So if you're looking for a VPN to use while traveling in China, you may want to consider a different option. Norton's Hong Kong servers dragged down overall speed scores, averaging just 6Mbps. Unlike many other VPNs, Norton doesn't allow you to choose the city you connect to - only the country. Overall, Norton's speeds are on par with other midtier VPNs, achieving only about 43% of the average 187Mbps speed achieved on a 1Gbps-capable fiber connection during testing, while still maintaining an average of around 81Mbps globally. That's one reason I'm more interested in testing the amount of speed lost (which for most VPNs is typically half or more) across both high-speed and slower connection types, and in using tools like to even out the playing field. And with any speed test, results are going to rely on your local infrastructure, with hyperfast internet service yielding higher test speed results. Internet speeds in the US vary widely by state and provider.
I ran my speed tests over the course of three days, in two locations, using both wireless and Ethernet connections - one location offered slower broadband speeds, and the other offered higher speeds via fiber-optic internet. Norton doesn't publicly post its server count on its website, but at last count there were 1,500 servers.
Number of server locations: 29 countries, 73 cities.